Graphene heating film — Positioning of the ABF® heating core vs. market solutions
8 PRODUCTS TESTED
4 TECHNOLOGIES
230V AC — 400–500W
INTERNAL TESTS + LAB
12/1
BACKGROUND
Dec. 2
WHY THIS COMPARATIVE STUDY ?
Compare the GRAPHENATON ABF® heating element with other heating elements on the market. The comparative study focuses on products with relatively equivalent power ratings (~400–500 W) under real-world conditions.
DATE OF REPORT
March 5, 2026
01
Compare heating core architectures and understand the links between construction and performance
02
Evaluate the integration of the ABF® core into a Heater (safety, thermal performance, costs)
03
Identify our competitive advantages compared to solutions on the market (thermal, electrical, security)
Dec. 3
4 TECHNOLOGIES, 4 WAYS TO HEAT
/ Understand the principles before comparing performance
CONVECTOR
An electrical resistance that heats the air around it. Hot air rises, cold air descends: circular circulation. Heats the air, not objects or people.
RADIANT PANEL
Emits infrared rays only from the front. Heats objects and people in its direct line of sight. Areas off-axis are less heated.
DRY INERTIA
Resistance embedded in a solid ceramic block. Stores heat and releases it slowly and evenly. Slow build-up, but long-lasting comfort.
★ ABF® GRAPHENE
Graphene film: optimal mix of radiation and convection. Uniform IR across 100% of the surface, complemented by gentle natural convection. The best of both heat transfer modes.
TECHNOLOGY
✓ ADVANTAGES
✗ DISADVANTAGES
CONVECTORCast iron/aluminum armored heating element
Aluminum — 500W / 230V AC Predominantly natural convection
RADIANT PANELS — 3 PRODUCTS
RADIANT 1
370W RADIANT FILM
Laminated film — on metal plate -Radiation
RADIANT 2
500W ALU CABLES
Aluminum cables — 500W / 230V AC Radiation + convection
RADIANT 3
350W WOVEN CABLES
conductive fabric cables Radiation distributed in bands
DRY INERTIA — 1 PRODUCT
INERTIA 1
500W CERAMIC
ceramic resistor 500W / 230V AC Thermal mass stores and slowly releases heat
★ ABF GRAPHENE — 1 PRODUCT
★ GRAPHENATON
ABF FILM — METAL FRONT PANEL
Film graphène encapsulé polymère
400 / 230V AC — technologie Graphenaton
ΔT bord–centre < 10°C — surface entièrement active
OPTIMAL MIX — RADIATION + CONVECTION
IR RADIATION
IR emitted across 100% of the surface — Wide coverage
NATURAL CONVECTION
Even heat distribution
No cold spots, no dry air, and a small temperature gradient.
DOMINANT MODE:
CONVECTION
RADIATION
THERMAL INERTIA
★ ABF FILM — OPTIMAL MIX
CONSUMPTION TEST — 18°C → 23°C, 10M² ROOM
12/6
ELECTRICITY CONSUMPTION
/ kWh consumed to heat an object located 1 meter away from 18°C to 23°C — same room, same initial conditions
TESTED SYSTEM
ENERGY CONSUMED (KWH)
DURATION
COST
Convection heater 1 — 500W
1.00 kWh
1 hour 40 minutes
20.0 cents
Radiant 1 — 520W
0.57 kWh
1 hour
11.4 cents
Convection Heater 2 — 500W
0.47 kWh
1 hour
9.4 cents
Convection Heater 3 — 500W
0.47 kWh
1 hour 13 minutes
9.4 cents
Inertia 1 — 500W
0.47 kWh
2 hours and 20 minutes
> 9.4 cents
Radiant 2 — 350W
0.27 kWh
12:45 a.m.
5.4 cents
Radiant 3 — 400W
0.26 kWh
12:38 a.m.
5.2 cents
ABF®-400 Film (single sheet)
0.17 kWh
12:25 a.m.
3.4 cents
★ ABF®-400 Film @ Metal Front Panel
0.12 kWh
−88% vs. Convection Heater 1 ▲
12:24 a.m.
2.4 cents
Electricity consumption based on a price of €0.20 per kWh
12/7
WHY ABF® WINS
Three simple reasons—backed by statistics—that anyone can verify
1
💰
'S LOWEST CONSUMPTION
To heat the same room to the same temperature, the ABF-380® uses 0.12 kWh, whereas the best competitor uses 0.26 kWh and the worst uses 1.00 kWh. Less energy for the same result.
÷ 8×
LESS THAN A TRADITIONAL CONVECTOR
2
⏱
FASTER HEATING IN THE
ABF® reaches the target temperature in 24 minutes, compared to 1 hour and 40 minutes for the Carrera—and shuts off automatically. No overheating, no waste.
24 MIN
TO REACH 23°C —
3
🌞
HEAT UNIFORMITY
The entire surface heats up to the same temperature. No hot spots, no cold spots. A convector heater has a temperature difference (ΔT) of 30°C between the hottest point and the edges. ABF®: ΔT is only 10°C.
ΔT = 10°C
HOMOGENEOUS SURFACE — NO HOT SPOTS
→
What this means in practice:
you pay 8 times less for electricity,
you reach the desired temperature 4 times faster,
and you enjoy gentle, even warmth without dry air.
It is simply the most efficient technology tested in this comparative study.
Savings Achieved — GRAPHENATON
12/8
SAVINGS ACHIEVED
/ Scaled to annual test conditions, excluding the purchase price of Heater 1,500 hours/year at €0.20/kWh
CAST IRON CONVECTOR — WORST CASE SCENARIO
300 €
Annual energy cost — 1,500 hours × $0.20/kWh
AVERAGE MARKET CONVECTORS
213 €
Atlantic / Welltherm / Carrera — mid-range market
★ ABF-380® — GRAPHENATON
36 €
Estimated annual energy cost
SAVINGS OF UP TO
€264/year
CLICK ON A Heater COMPARE
SYSTEM
KWH/H
PURCHASE
/AN
Atlantic Res. Fonte
1.00 kWh
93€
300€
Atlantic Aluminum
0.80 kWh
247€
240€
Carrera Aluminum
0.90 kWh
50€
270€
Noirot Film 370W
0.65 kWh
830€
195€
Bestherm ARIA 500W
0.70 kWh
60€
210€
Welltherm Aluminum Cables
0.60 kWh
730€
180€
Heat4All 350W
0.54 kWh
699€
162€
★ ABF-380® Graphene
0.12 kWh
140€
36€
* Radiator prices — manufacturer catalogs, February 2026
TOTAL CUMULATIVE COST — PURCHASE + ENERGY OVER 6 YEARS
★ ABF-380® — €140 + €36/year
—
—
YOU SAVE / 6 YEARS
—
←
SELECT A Heater COMPARE
HEATING ELEMENT
—
Consumption: — —
10 / 12
RADAR DIAGRAM
ABF-400 HEATING ELEMENT
RADIANT PANEL
CERAMIC HEART
CONVECTOR HEATER
PHOTOS HEARTS OF HEAT
ABF-400® HEATING ELEMENT
RADIANT PANEL
CERAMIC HEATING ELEMENT
CONVECTOR HEATER
COMPARISON — SAME PRICE, DIFFERENT PERFORMANCE12 / 12
THE MARKET LEADER,BEATEN AT ITS OWN PRICE.
/ ABF® 400W vs Atlantic Solius Digital 500W — nearly identical price for Heater — test heating an object in a room from 18°C to 23°C